This paper purports to discern the main trends of Russian literature studies in Korea during 1990-2000. These ten years can be described as a waters hed in the development of Russian studies in Korea, since ideological and political barriers hindering ...

This paper purports to discern the main trends of Russian literature studies in Korea during 1990-2000. These ten years can be described as a waters hed in the development of Russian studies in Korea, since ideological and political barriers hindering the direct cultural interaction between South Korea and Russia disappeared at the beginning of the 1990s.
The DB prepared for this quantitative analysis of Russian literature studies in Korea comprises 341 articles on Russian literature published in major Korean academic journals during this period. Collected information was processed in to MS Excel program based on specific criteria: periodization of literary history, genre, author, and methodology applied for each academic article.
In terms of periodization, 19th century and modernism attracted more attention from Korean specialists, while Russian literature of up to 18th century and contemporary literature proved to be comparatively less represented.
Among various genres prose played the leading role taking more than 60% of the corpus. While interest in drama is rising, studies on Russian poetry, as a whole, seems to lose previous vitality.
In terms of Russian authors studied by Korean specialists, most major Russian writers of respective period received appropriate attention. However, some classical writers, especially poets enjoying high recognition in Russia and abroad as well are less represented in our Russian studies. And due to limited consensus among Korean specialists on the so-called cannons of 20th century Russian literature our spectrum of contemporary Russian writers proved to be extremely dispersive. As far as the methodology is concerned, most articles analyzed in this paper have a tendency focusing on the study of literary texts themselves, rather than concentrating on biographical information or illuminating the relations between literary work and its social surroundings. And the most prevalent subcategories of methodology turned out to be stylistics and thematics followed by comparative study or genetical approach.

해당사항 없음

해당사항 없음

This paper purports to discern the main trends of Russian literature studies in Korea during 1990-2000. These ten years can be described as a waters hed in the development of Russian studies in Korea, since ideological and political barriers hindering ...

This paper purports to discern the main trends of Russian literature studies in Korea during 1990-2000. These ten years can be described as a waters hed in the development of Russian studies in Korea, since ideological and political barriers hindering the direct cultural interaction between South Korea and Russia disappeared at the beginning of the 1990s.
The DB prepared for this quantitative analysis of Russian literature studies in Korea comprises 341 articles on Russian literature published in major Korean academic journals during this period. Collected information was processed in to MS Excel program based on specific criteria: periodization of literary history, genre, author, and methodology applied for each academic article.
In terms of periodization, 19th century and modernism attracted more attention from Korean specialists, while Russian literature of up to 18th century and contemporary literature proved to be comparatively less represented.
Among various genres prose played the leading role taking more than 60% of the corpus. While interest in drama is rising, studies on Russian poetry, as a whole, seems to lose previous vitality.
In terms of Russian authors studied by Korean specialists, most major Russian writers of respective period received appropriate attention. However, some classical writers, especially poets enjoying high recognition in Russia and abroad as well are less represented in our Russian studies. And due to limited consensus among Korean specialists on the so-called cannons of 20th century Russian literature our spectrum of contemporary Russian writers proved to be extremely dispersive. As far as the methodology is concerned, most articles analyzed in this paper have a tendency focusing on the study of literary texts themselves, rather than concentrating on biographical information or illuminating the relations between literary work and its social surroundings. And the most prevalent subcategories of methodology turned out to be stylistics and thematics followed by comparative study or genetical approach.

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연구 대상 시기 및 장르별 분포
Ⅲ. 연구 대상 작가의 분포
Ⅳ. 연구 방법론
Ⅴ. 연구 추이의 변화 양상
Ⅵ. 맺음말

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연구 대상 시기 및 장르별 분포
Ⅲ. 연구 대상 작가의 분포
Ⅳ. 연구 방법론
Ⅴ. 연구 추이의 변화 양상
Ⅵ. 맺음말