This paper deals with multiple wh-quetions in Russian. Russian is a-MFS(Rudin's terminology) language which has no island violations and allows rather free order of fronted wh-words. However, contrary to Rudin's argument, extraction of multi ...

This paper deals with multiple wh-quetions in Russian. Russian is a-MFS(Rudin's terminology) language which has no island violations and allows rather free order of fronted wh-words. However, contrary to Rudin's argument, extraction of multiple wh-words from čtoby clauses and infinitival clauses is possible.
The syntactic structure of multiple wh-question constructions which can be applied to both +MFS languages can be described in short as follows: 1) Wh-adjuncts moved through focus movement in front of the sentence is adjoined to SpecCP' ; 2) Other wh-arguments are adjoined to SpecCp ; 3) Wh-word which comes after the complimentizer (ze in Polish) is adjoined to IP.
This paper adopts mechanisms of Optimality Theory which choose the optimal candidate among variants, using constraints and ranking them. Constraints, such as FRONTING, SORTKEY, SUPER(IORITY), CONJ(UNCTION)
sorted out the optimal, good or acceptable, bad or unacceptable sentences with multiple whwords in RUssian. Violation of the constraint FRONTING made the worst sentences.

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 다중 의문사 구문
Ⅲ. 다중 의문사 구문의 통사적 구조
Ⅳ. 러시아어의 의문사구 이동과 관련된 제약들
Ⅴ. 최적성 이론에 적용한 다중 의문사 구문
Ⅵ. 결론

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 다중 의문사 구문
Ⅲ. 다중 의문사 구문의 통사적 구조
Ⅳ. 러시아어의 의문사구 이동과 관련된 제약들
Ⅴ. 최적성 이론에 적용한 다중 의문사 구문
Ⅵ. 결론