Why do speakers of all languages use different grammatical structures under different communicative circumstances to express the same idea? Professor Lambrecht explores the relationship between the structure of the sentence and the linguistic and extr ...

Why do speakers of all languages use different grammatical structures under different communicative circumstances to express the same idea? Professor Lambrecht explores the relationship between the structure of the sentence and the linguistic and extra-linguistic context in which it is used. His analysis is based on the observation that the structure of a sentence reflects a speaker's assumption about the hearer's state of knowledge and consciousness at the time of the utterance. This relationship between speaker assumptions and formal sentence structure is governed by rules and conventions of grammar, in a component called 'information structure'. Four independent but interrelated categories are analysed: presupposition and assertion, identifiability and activation, topic, and focus.

(출처 : Cambirdge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607)

본 자료는 최종결과물(결과보고서)의 원자료이다.

본 연구는 『금강경(金剛經)』텍스트에 나타난 정보구조와 번역 양상에 관한 연구로, 『금강경』에 나타난 출발 텍스트와 도착 텍스트 간에 정보구조와 번역 양상에 대해 분석하였다. 이 때 본 자료의 기능문법 구조 및 정보 ...

본 자료는 최종결과물(결과보고서)의 원자료이다.

본 연구는 『금강경(金剛經)』텍스트에 나타난 정보구조와 번역 양상에 관한 연구로, 『금강경』에 나타난 출발 텍스트와 도착 텍스트 간에 정보구조와 번역 양상에 대해 분석하였다. 이 때 본 자료의 기능문법 구조 및 정보구조에 관한 이론이 주요하게 활용되었다.

Preface ... xiii
1 Introduction ... 1
1.1 What is information structure? ... 1
1.2 The place of information structure in grammar ... 6
1.3 Information structure and sentence form: a sample analysis ... 13
1.3.1 Three examples ... 13
1.3.2 ...

Preface ... xiii
1 Introduction ... 1
1.1 What is information structure? ... 1
1.2 The place of information structure in grammar ... 6
1.3 Information structure and sentence form: a sample analysis ... 13
1.3.1 Three examples ... 13
1.3.2 A note on markedness in information structure ... 15
1.3.3 Analysis ... 19
1.3.4 Summary ... 24
1.4 Information structure and syntax ... 25
1.4.1 Autonomy versus motivation in grammar ... 26
1.4.2 The functional underspecification of syntactic structures ... 29
1.4.3 Sentence types and the notion of grammatical construction ... 32
2 Information ... 36
2.1 The universe of discourse ... 36
2.2 Information ... 43
2.3 Presupposition and assertion ... 51
2.4 The pragmatic accommodation of presuppositional structure ... 65
3 The mental representations of discourse referents ... 74
3.1 Discourse referents ... 74
3.2 Identifiability ... 77
3.2.1 Identifiability and presupposition ... 77
3.2.2 Identifiability and definiteness ... 79
3.2.3 The establishment of identifiability in discourse ... 87
3.3 Activation ... 93
3.3.1 The activation states of referents ... 93
3.3.2 Principles of pragmatic construal ... 101
3.4 Summary and illustration ... 105
3.5 Identifiability, activation, and the topic-focus parameter ... 113
4 Pragmatic relations: topic ... 117
4.1 Definition of topic ... 117
4.1.1 Topic and aboutness ... 117
4.1.2 Topic referents and topic expressions ... 127
4.2 Topic and subject ... 131
4.2.1 Subjects as unmarked topics ... 131
4.2.2 Non-topical subjects and the thetic-categorical distinction ... 137
4.2.3 Topical non-subjects and multiple-topic sentences ... 146
4.3 Topic, presupposition, and semantic interpretation ... 150
4.4 Topic and the mental representations of referents ... 160
4.4.1 Topic relation and activation state ... 160
4.4.2 The Topic Acceptability Scale ... 165
4.4.3 Unaccented pronominals as preferred topic expressions ... 172
4.4.4 Topic promotion ... 176
4.4.4.1 Presentational constructions ... 177
4.4.4.2 Detachment constructions ... 181
4.5 Implications for syntactic theory ... 184
4.5.1 The Principle of the Separation of Reference and Role ... 184
4.5.2 The PSRR and the canonical sentence model ... 189
4.5.3 The syntactic status of detached constituents ... 192
4.6 Topic and pragmatic accommodation ... 195
4.7 Topic and word order ... 199
5 Pragmatic relations: focus ... 206
5.1 Definition of focus ... 206
5.1.1 Focus, presupposition, and assertion ... 206
5.1.2 Focus, and sentence accents ... 218
5.2 Focus structure and focus marking ... 221
5.2.1 Types of focus structure ... 221
5.2.2 Predicate-focus structure ... 226
5.2.3 Argument-focus structure ... 228
5.2.4 Sentence-focus structure ... 233
5.2.5 Summary ... 235
5.3 Prosodic accents: iconicity, rule, default ... 238
5.3.1 Accent, intonation, stress ... 238
5.3.2 Iconic motivation versus grammatical rule ... 241
5.3.3 Default accentuation ... 248
5.4 Focus and the mental representations of referents ... 257
5.4.1 Focus relation and activation state ... 257
5.4.2 Predicates versus arguments ... 264
5.4.3 Focus relation, activation, and presupposition ... 269
5.4.3.1 Complete presupposed propositions ... 270
5.4.3.2 Open presupposed propositions ... 277
5.4.4 Focus and information questions ... 282
5.5 Contrastiveness ... 286
5.5.1 Contrastive foci ... 286
5.5.2 Contrastive topics ... 291
5.6 Marked and unmarked focus structure ... 296
5.6.1 Predicate focus and argument focus ... 297
5.6.2 Sentence focus ... 307
5.6.2.1 The theoretical issue ... 307
5.6.2.2 Previous approaches ... 311
5.6.2.3 Prosodic inversion ... 318
5.7 A unified functional account of sentence accentuation ... 322
5.7.1 Activation prosody revisited ... 323
5.7.2 Topic accents and focus accents: some examples ... 326
6 Summary and conclusion ... 334
Notes ... 341
References ... 362
Index ... 376

(출처 : RISS, http://www.riss.kr/link?id=M276560)