Self-affirmation processes are being activated by information that threatens the perceived adequacy or integrity of the self and as running their course until this perception is restored through explanation, rationalization, and/or action. The purpose ...

Self-affirmation processes are being activated by information that threatens the perceived adequacy or integrity of the self and as running their course until this perception is restored through explanation, rationalization, and/or action. The purpose of these constant explanations (and rationalizations) is to maintain a phenomenal experience of the self-self-conceptions and images as adaptively and morally adequate—that is, as competent, good, coherent, unitary, stable, capable of free choice, capable of controlling important outcomes, and so on. The research reported in this chapter focuses on the way people cope with the implications of threat to their self-regard rather than on the way they cope with the threat itself. This chapter analyzes the way coping processes restore self-regard rather than the way they address the provoking threat itself.

(출처 : ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60229-4)

본 자료는 최종결과물(결과보고서)의 원자료이다.

본 연구는 자기가치확인 이론에 근거하여 의도행동 불일치 현상의 유발을 단계적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 이 때, 해당 자료가 본 연구의 이론적 기반이 되었다.

본 자료는 최종결과물(결과보고서)의 원자료이다.

본 연구는 자기가치확인 이론에 근거하여 의도행동 불일치 현상의 유발을 단계적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 이 때, 해당 자료가 본 연구의 이론적 기반이 되었다.

I. Introduction
A. NAME-CALLING AND COMPLIANCE: A DEMONSTRATIONAL STUDY
B. SELF-AFFZRMATION PROCESSES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
1. The Importance of Self-Afirmution Processes
2. The Fluidity of Self-Afirmation Processes
3. Self-Afirmation Proces ...

I. Introduction
A. NAME-CALLING AND COMPLIANCE: A DEMONSTRATIONAL STUDY
B. SELF-AFFZRMATION PROCESSES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
1. The Importance of Self-Afirmution Processes
2. The Fluidity of Self-Afirmation Processes
3. Self-Afirmation Processes and Social Psychological Theory

II. Dissonance as Self-Affirmation
A. REDUClNG DISSONANCE THROUGH VALUE AFFIRMATION
B. AFFIRMATION OR DISTRACTION?
C. GENERALITY OF THE SELF-AFFLRMATION EFFECT IN THE FORCED-COMPLIANCE PARADIGM
D. DISSONANCE AND THE LAB COAT
E. THE NATURE OF DISSONANCE MOTIVATION
1. What Dissonance Is Not
2. What Dissonance Is
3. Reducing Dissonance

Ⅲ. The Role of Psychological Inconsistency in Mental Life
A. PSYCHOLOGICAL INCONSISTENCY: FORM NOT MOTIVE
B. CONSISTENCY VERSUS SELF-ENHANCEMENT STRIVINGS
C. FLEXIBILITY IN COPING WITH INCONSISTENCY

IV. A Psychology of Experimental Embarrassments: A Paradigm Problem

V. Attribution as Self-Affirmation
VI. Toward a Model of Self-Affirmation Processes
A. CONCLUSIONS: THE NATURE OF SELF-AFFIRMATION
1. The Goal of Self-Afirmation: Global Self-Integrity
2. The Flexibility of Self-Afirmation
3. Self-Affirmation as a Source of Self-objectivity
B. PROPOSITIONS: THE MECHANISMS OF SELF-AFFIRMATION
1. Arousal of a Self-AfJirmation Motive
2. The Reduction of the Self-Affirmation Motive
3. Determining the Means of Self-Afirmation
C. THE AFFIRMATION OF NEGATIVE SELF-CONCEPTS

VII. Implications
A. A MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENT OF THE SELF-SYSTEM
1. Evidence of a Self-Afirmation Motive
2. The Self-Affirmation Technique: Distinguishing Self-Serving from Cognitive-lnformational Biases
B. SELF- AFFIRMATION PROCESSES AS BRAIN FUNCTION

Acknowledgments
References