연구성과물 검색 타이틀 이미지

HOME ICON HOME > Search by Achievements Type > Articles View

Articles Detailed Information

근대문학의 재생산 회로와 검열-개벽을 중심으로
Article NRF is supported by Research Projects( 한국 근대문학의 재생산 제도에 대한 시계열적 비교 분석: 1910~1940 ( - 작가와 독자의 상호작용을 중심으로 - ) | 2004 Year 인문사회분야지원일반연구 신청요강 다운로드 PDF다운로드 | 박헌호(성균관대학교) ) data is submitted to the Intermediate results
Researcher who has been awarded a research grant by Humanities and Social Studies Support Program of NRF has to submit more quantity of thses or books than quantity of demanding in an application handbook as an end product within 2 years(* depend on the form of business)
사업별 신청요강보기
  • Researchers have entered the information directly to the NRF of Korea research support system
Journal 대동문화연구 - 등재 (ISSN : 1225-3820)
ᅟPublication History 2006년 03월 01일 / Vol.53 No.0 / pp. 77 ~ 120
Publisher/ᅟInstitute 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
Author number 1
  • Korean
  • Reproduction Circuit of Modern Literature and Censorship
    This treatise aims at looking into reproduction circuit of modern literature in condition of colonial period. In other words, I intend to prove colonization of reproduction circuit. Censorship was used to break a stereotypical understanding that individual system(‘Deung-dan’ which means getting into the literary circles &‘Seung-In’ which means the approval regime) which consists of the circuit.
    During early and middle of 1920s, [Gaebyuk] which was well known for ‘media centrism’ provided research materials the relations between reproduction circuit of modern literature and censorship. Thanks to awareness and pains of editors of [Gaebyuk], censorship of that time was almost restored. Especially, collation between each editions and the original copy resulted in statistical data’s periodical and interrelated authenticity in the time of confiscation and deletion. Reconstituted materials helped to make out the regard and intention of censorship’s main body.
    In interpreting of materials, things were considered such as importance of [Gaebyuk] as a media and literary status of [Gaebyuk]. Also, historical status was considered because at that time socialism was accepted so gladly that it turned out to be a threat to an empire. Most of all, after the promotion of ‘Left-Right Aliiance’, it was considered as a fait complished among people in 1924~7 and all that influenced quite a bit.
    Interpretation of documents explains next few things. First, during early and middle of 1920s, between the ‘Anti-Conventional School’ and ‘Unyielding Bourgeois Literature’, there exist the difference of censorship’s density. Second, as ‘Unyielding Bourgeois Literature’ was excluded from reproduction circuit, two trends run ideological parallelism. Third, through all those phenomenon, the plan of empire for Chosun’s modern literature was centered on division between Proletarian Literature and Bourgeois Literature so that literature of Chosun would be domestical.
  • Examination field of requesting this research issues( The ranking of possible field is up to 3rd place)
  • 1Ranking : 인문학 > 문학 > 문학사
  • List of digital content of this articles
데이터를 로딩중 입니다.
데이터를 로딩 중입니다.
  • This document, it is necessary to display the original author and you do not have permission
    to use copyrighted material for-profit
  • In addition , it does not allow the change or secondary writings of work
데이터 이용 만족도
자료이용후 의견
트위터 페이스북
NRF Daejeon
(34113) 201, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea
Tel: 82-42-869-6114 / Fax: 82-42-869-6777
NRF Seoul
(06792) 25, Heonreung-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea
Tel: 82-2-3460-5500 / Fax: 82-2-3460-5759
KRM Help Center
Tel : 042-710-4360
E-mail : / Fax : 042-861-4380